Pest and weed strategies let us down


If you read the newly-released draft national strategies on weeds and feral animals you might have thought the white flag had been hoisted.

According to the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, these documents ‘describe how Australian local, state and federal government agencies work with the community and industry to prevent the spread of new pest animals [and] manage issues in relation to weeds’.

While they contain sound goals and priorities such as a focus on prevention, early intervention and minimising the impact of established pests and weeds, they have no substance. There are no actions, no new initiatives. The 2007 strategies, the strategies’ predecessors, had 72 actions.

The new draft strategies effectively absolve the Australian Government of any leadership role, there are few coordinated initiatives and they rely on action by each state government, industry and the community.

For weeds, the Weeds of National Significance program that was transferred to the states in 2013 remains without national funding and the national weed spread prevention plan that was an incomplete action in the 2007 strategy is no longer mentioned.

There is no coordinated plan to reduce the number of weedy plants being sold in nurseries, no attempt to standardise weed listings across the states, no action to tackle the illegal internet trade of weed seeds, no support for a weeds cooperative research centre style body and no mention of the need for a research, development and evaluation strategy for environmental weeds.

For pest animals, the strategy emphasises the control of established pests. Action on new pests is vague and non-committal. The ring-necked parakeet is highlighted as a pet bird with ‘extreme pest potential’ in a case study. Its impacts are rated ‘severe’ yet no action is proposed to address this major threat.

The draft Australian Pest Animal Strategy and the Australian Weeds Strategy were prepared by the federal, state and territory governments with no community input. They will operate from 2017 to 2027 and be reviewed after five years.

Make your submission now

Comments on the draft strategies are open until 5pm 14 October 2016.

Related posts

Spear thistle. Photo: Judith Gray
Weed wrangling in Australia
Snowy 2.0 could catapult invasive fish species into new waterways
Setting the stage for invasive species research
2020 Australian Biosecurty Award
Yellow crazy ant action in Lismore earns 2020 biosecurity gong
Deer are becoming an increasing problem in Australia.
The rise and rise of feral deer in Australia
Land restoration. Photo: Brett Wheaton
Environmental bridge to recovery jobs package
Coronavirus: Our work is more important than ever
After the fires: Ferals and weeds among nature's biggest threats
Bushfire recovery must tackle feral animals and weeds
Snap a bee, ant or wasp

One Response to “Pest and weed strategies let us down”

  1. Hi Tim,
    I will be meeting with our new Federal Minister in about 3 weeks. Actions and initiatives seem to be missing. I live in the south eastern suburbs of Melbourne where fox, rat and cats are difficult to control. It is up to the Council who are afraid to hurt people’s pets (even if they are either off the lead (dog) or out of house boundary (cats).
    I have also been frustrated by commercial nurseries selling so much introduced plant material and especially hybrid natives. Habitat is so important for maintaining healthy wildlife.
    Can you give me a few leads to pass on to Tim Wilson please on the above or the wider Australian problems.