New partnership maps invasive risks and pathways

Our new partnership with Monash University will would inform surveillance efforts at arrival points across Australia. Photo: Danielle | Flickr | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Our new partnership with Monash University will would inform surveillance efforts at arrival points across Australia. Photo: Danielle | Flickr | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

How do you know which new invasive species need to be stopped from entering Australia if you haven’t worked out what it is you are stopping or how it will arrive? These are just some of the questions we are trying to answer as part of a major new partnership with Monash University.

In designing a risk-based biosecurity system, the first step is to identify the highest risks. Then the most likely pathways would be identified and surveillance, quarantine and early response systems set up to prevent the pests from arriving.

For Australia’s main livestock and horticulture industries the priority pests, disease risks and pathways have been identified. For the environment, the work so far has been very rudimentary.

This was recognised by the 2015 Senate inquiry which recommended the federal government “develop and publish a national priority list of pests and diseases not yet established in Australia that are of environmental biosecurity concern”.

Also, a draft report of this year’s review of Australia’s inter-governmental biosecurity agreement warned that “national environmental pest and disease risks are yet to be systematically identified, prioritised and planned for”.

To remove this road block and strengthen Australia’s environmental biosecurity system, we have teamed up with Monash University’s School of Biological Sciences and, generously backed by the Ian Potter Foundation, created the environmental biosecurity risks and pathways project.

The $600,000 three-year project will systematically map and develop a national priority list of potential insect and plant disease invaders that could harm Australia’s natural environment. It will identify likely pathways of arrival and the impacts if they do make it into our country.

We believe this is the first time in the world a non-government partnership has led this type of detailed biosecurity risk identification (let us know if you are aware of other similar non-government led projects).

Further contributions are being sought to expand the scope of the project. Federal and state governments will be invited to join the project reference group.

Recent high profile breaches show Australia’s biosecurity system is still not robust enough to keep dangerous new invaders out of the country. This project will provide clear advice to governments on how to strengthen that system and address its gaps.

More info


Related posts

Protect Australia
A white tern flying over Lord Howe Island. Photo: Patrick Kavanagh | Flickr | CC BY 2.0
All systems go for Lord Howe Island rat eradication
Texas National Guard soldiers arrive in Houston, Texas to aid citizens in heavily flooded areas from the storms of Hurricane Harvey. Frighteningly, rafts of fire ants were also seen on the rising floodwaters. Photo: Lt. Zachary West, 100th MPAD | Flickr | CC BY-ND 2.0
Living with fire ants: Houston, we have a problem
Water buffalo in the Northern Territory. Photo: Geoff Whalan | Flickr | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
New crops and livestock – you can never be too cautious
One idea to increase funding for environmental biosecurity includes a $5 levy on air containers, $10 on shipping containers. Photo: Dirk Dallas | CC BY-NC 2.0
Time to give the environment equal billing
Feral deer could occupy nearly all of Australia
Tasmanian bumblebee decision defies the evidence
Fire ant funding approved, but still a hard road ahead
Biosecurity roundtables: the conversation is starting
Fire ant fight 2.0: A battle we must win