When hunting works for feral animal control

While the NSW Game Council markets a phony version of feral animal control by claiming that every rabbit, fox or pig killed by a hunter is a conservation win, some shooters are genuine ‘voluntary conservation hunters’.

The Invasive Species Council opposes the recent move by the NSW Government to allow hunting in national parks because ad hoc killing by untested amateurs does not equate to effective, humane and safe feral animal control. But some hunters understand what feral animal control requires, and are focused on defined conservation goals.

The first objective of a division of the Sporting Shooters Association known as Conservation and Wildlife Management (CWM) is “identify, maintain, protect and restore biotic communities”. Some of the state branches are striving to deliver on this.

For example, the Queensland branch shoots, traps and monitors feral pigs for the Queensland Government to protect critically endangered Kroombit tinker frogs (Taudactylus pleione), and controls cats, foxes and dogs to protect endangered Bridled nailtail wallabies (Onychogalea fraenata) on a nature refuge. I have heard government environment officers praise this program.

Kroombit Tops, habitat for Kroombit tinker frog

Kroombit Tops National Park (southwest of Gladstone, Qld), where the critically endangered Kroombit tinker frog is known from just nine small unconnected patches of rainforest. Major threats include disease (chytrid fungus), wildfire, and feral pigs. Photo: Harry Phillips (Creative Commons licence)

The South Australian branch has participated in the successful Bounceback program, a long-term, landscape-scale program using multiple methods to protect the Flinders, Olary and Gawler Ranges in South Australia from feral animals and weeds, and restore biodiversity.

Flinders Ranges, Bounceback program

The semi-arid landscape of the Flinders Ranges, where Bounceback, a major ecological restoration program, operates. Photo: Ralph Bestic (Creative Commons licence)

These projects exemplify the differences between outcome-focused feral animal control and ad hoc recreational killing, outlined in the table below. The approach of CWM Qld is to initially carry out a property assessment and formulate an “integrated pest management plan” in cooperation with land managers.  Volunteer teams are then allocated to implement the plan. All members must pass accreditation courses, which include bushcraft skills and high level marksmanship. They also do trapping, scientific data collection, animal and plant surveys, flood recovery clean up and general assistance for property owners.

Genuine ‘conservation hunting’ Game Council-managed hunting in NSW state forests
Focused on ecological sustainability. Defined conservation goals – outcome-focused killing. Focused on sustainable hunting opportunities. No defined conservation goals – ad hoc killing.
Baseline assessment of threats and values. No baseline assessment.
Management plan. Shooting integrated with other control methods and conservation activities, informed by ecology. No management plan. No integration with conservation programs.
Competency testing, high level marksmanship required. No competency testing, variable skill levels.
Intensive and sustained control effort, and maintenance. Limited control pressure – 1 hunter permitted/400 hectares.
Monitoring and evaluation of outcomes. No monitoring, no evaluation (just numbers killed).

In sum, skilled recreational shooters can contribute to feral animal control in the following circumstances:

  • when they participate in professional control programs, such as Operation Bounceback in South Australia, or
  • when they exert sufficient sustained pressure over small accessible areas.

In contrast to the Game Council, CWM groups seem to recognise the limitations of shooting and the need to integrate it with other methods. As the website of the South Australian branch says, “The solution [for feral animal control] is not simple, cheap, small scale or quick to achieve.”

These hunters striving for genuine conservation outcomes must surely be irked when the hunting lobby uses their work to claim credit for other hunters who do nothing for conservation.


Related posts

Spear thistle. Photo: Judith Gray
Weed wrangling in Australia
Snowy 2.0 could catapult invasive fish species into new waterways
Setting the stage for invasive species research
2020 Australian Biosecurty Award
Yellow crazy ant action in Lismore earns 2020 biosecurity gong
Deer are becoming an increasing problem in Australia.
The rise and rise of feral deer in Australia
Land restoration. Photo: Brett Wheaton
Environmental bridge to recovery jobs package
Coronavirus: Our work is more important than ever
After the fires: Ferals and weeds among nature's biggest threats
Bushfire recovery must tackle feral animals and weeds
Snap a bee, ant or wasp

2 Responses to “When hunting works for feral animal control”

  1. There seems to be a lot of discussion these days regarding the
    disastrous feral animal situation in National Parks and permitting
    hunting, I cannot see why the Australian army sharp shooters could not
    go on large hunts during breeding seasons (this has worked in QLD)of
    foxes and cats obviously working in conjunction with National Parks
    offices, we should be utilising these resources more fully. Furthermore
    regarding the dingo issues and sheep there are breeds of dog that will
    live and protect sheep this IS a measure farmers could use to protect
    their flocks if they put this into practice. I also feel that the
    National Parks Rangers should be doing more in regards to managing and
    culling exotic pests, surely traps could be made that that could lure
    animals through the use of recorded mating calls at breeding times thus
    eliminating cats and foxes at these prime times when they are
    regenerating in the millions. Just a few ideas that would work if put
    into play. It is shame that both Liberal and Labor governments have both
    proven to be ineffective in pretty much all areas regarding our native
    flora and fauna, sad days 🙁

  2. Feral animals really pose threat to eco-conservation when they destroy plants and trees and also the birds nest and their eggs. Killing feral animals is the only way to stop this however the fine line between the killing for a cause and recreational killing must be drawn.