The Invasive Species Council has welcomed a NSW Land and Environment Court decision dismissing another legal challenge to feral horse control in a national park, clearing the way for control operations to resume in Yuraygir National Park.
The Court today dismissed a challenge to the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service’s authority to remove feral horses from Yuraygir National Park and Yuraygir State Conservation Area using aerial shooting, ground shooting and other approved control methods.
The challenge failed on every ground, with the Court finding NPWS has multiple legal bases to undertake feral horse control, including under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, the park’s Plan of Management and the Biosecurity Act 2015.
The decision follows a string of previous unsuccessful legal challenges to feral horse control in NSW national parks.
‘Once again, enormous energy and effort has been spent defending lawful action to protect our national parks from feral horses, and once again the challenge has been thrown out,’ Invasive Species Council Indigenous Ambassador and Wiradjuri man Richard Swain said.
‘NPWS won on every ground. The Court has made it clear that our national park managers have the lawful authority to remove feral horses, including through aerial shooting.
‘This is an important decision. If Ms Jackson’s claim had been accepted, all shooting of all feral animals in national parks and reserves could have been delayed while new procedures were implemented.
‘This is the fifth decision in the NSW Land and Environment Court on feral horse matters since July. All decisions so far have confirmed that the NSW government is acting legally and appropriately in managing feral horse damage in national parks.
‘These repeated court cases take time, energy and resources away from the work that actually needs to happen on the ground – protecting Country and our precious native wildlife from the damage caused by feral horses.
‘Feral horses trample wetlands, damage waterways, spread weeds and destroy habitat. In Yuraygir they threaten sensitive coastal landscapes and the nesting grounds of threatened shorebirds.
‘National parks exist to protect nature and Country. Our park managers need to be able to get on with that job using effective, evidence-based control methods.
‘There are strong animal welfare safeguards around these operations. NPWS control methods must follow feral horse standard operating procedures, including for aerial shooting, and those procedures were developed following consultation with RSPCA NSW and relevant experts.
‘We hope this decision means NPWS can now get back to protecting Yuraygir without further unnecessary delay.’
Media inquiries: (02) 8006 5004
Background:
- The case was brought by Carmen Jackson against Alex Graham, Deputy Secretary of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service.
- The challenge concerned the authority to use aerial shooting and other lethal control methods to remove feral horses from Yuraygir National Park and Yuraygir State Conservation Area.
- Justice Pepper dismissed the challenge on 30 October 2026.
- The Court found the park’s Plan of Management requires feral horses to be removed and that ‘remove’ includes removal through lethal control.
- The Court found the method used to remove feral horses is an operational matter for NPWS, subject to the usual requirements of lawful and reasonable decision-making.
- The Court found the proposed shooting operations were also supported by authorisations under section 171 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act and biosecurity directions requiring feral horses to be removed.
- The judgment records that NPWS’s Pest Management Plan allows ground shooting, aerial shooting and passive trapping and killing in yards.
- These control methods must be undertaken in accordance with relevant NPWS standard operating procedures.
- The judgment records that the feral horse SOPs were developed following consultation with RSPCA NSW and relevant subject matter experts.
- Feral horses cause extensive damage through grazing and trampling, including loss of vegetation, soil compaction and erosion, damage to waterways and reduced water quality.
Information on other previously lost court cases:
VIC:
- Court cases in Victoria (1) Australian Brumby Alliance Inc v Parks Victoria. Judge: O’Bryan J. Date of judgment: 8 May 2020. Available online at https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCA/2020/605.html (Or go to https://www.austlii.edu.au/ and search on ‘Australian Brumby Alliance Inc v Parks Victoria’.)
- Australian Brumby Alliance Inc v Parks Victoria. Supreme Court of Victoria. Judge: O’Meara J. Heard: 1 and 2 December 2022. Judgement: 8 February 2023. [2023] VSC 26. Available online at https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VSC/2023/26.html (Or go to https://www.austlii.edu.au/ and search on ‘Australian Brumby Alliance Inc v Parks Victoria’.)
- Maguire v Parks Victoria [2020] VSC 303 (29 May 2020). Available online at https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VSC/2020/303.html (Or go to https://www.austlii.edu.au/ and search on Maguire v Parks Victoria). Subsequent appeal VSCA 172 (25 June 2020) Both dismissed.
NSW:
- Snowy Mountains Brumby Sustainability & Management Group Incorporated v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWLEC 92. Judgement. The SMBSMG sought to restrain the State of New South Wales and the Chief Executive of the National Parks and Wildlife Service from completing wild horse management activities in Kosciuszko National Park. Justice Duggan dismissed the case.
- Snowy Mountain Bush Users Group Inc v Minister for the Environment [2024] NSWSC 1040. Judgement. Dismissed with SMBUG ordered to pay costs.