Hunting Changes in NSW Fail to Address the Problem

In NSW the Shooters and Fishers Party, had managed to elevate deer to effectively protected status.

In NSW the Shooters and Fishers Party have elevated deer to effectively protected status.

In October the NSW Parliament passed legislation abolishing the NSW Game Council in response to the backlash against the proposal for recreational hunting in national parks.

While the abolition may see the end of the counter productive influence on feral animal control by the NSW Game Council, the fear is that recreational hunting may now emerge as a new force from within its new home in the Department of Primary Industries.  So far this is not evident, but without legal safeguards the same problems of an out-of-control hunting culture within government could easily emerge again.

The abolition of the Game Council and a halt to proposed unsupervised hunting in national parks was first announced in July 2013. It was triggered by a governance review of the council after the acting CEO and a volunteer were charged with firearm and trespass offences. The Invasive Species Council was hoping the NSW Government would use this change of attitude towards the role of recreational hunting as a time to get serious about feral animal control, especially for the growing threat of invasive deer.

The NSW Game Council and their political sponsor, the Shooters and Fishers Party, had managed to elevate deer to effectively protected status. Landholders were no longer allowed to engage contractors or volunteers to control deer on their own properties without using a Game Council licenced shooter and effective control methods such as spotlight shooting were banned. Even on public lands there has been little coordinated control, and deer numbers are growing.

The Greens attempted to amend the legislation abolishing the Game Council to void the special ‘game species’ status for deer. They also sought to make control and eradication of feral animals one of the objectives of the legislation.

Both Labor and the Coalition must still be afraid of the Shooters and Fishers Party because neither party would deliver what they privately said were sensible changes to the hunting regime.

While we are likely to see recreational hunting restart in State forests, at least thought and planning have gone into a three-year trial of supervised shooting using volunteers in 12 national parks and reserves in western NSW.  Modelled on volunteer shooting programs in South Australia, Victoria and Queensland, it may prove to be helpful as a supplement to other feral control programs. One key factor to watch is the cost and effectiveness of the program compared to using professional shooters.

With the exception of the national parks shooting trial, it seems we can expect recreational hunting interests to hold an unhealthy sway over some feral animal policies in NSW for some time yet.


Related posts

Snap a bee, ant or wasp
Environmental biosecurity chief delivers
Missing in action: our new biodiversity strategy
Feral futures theme for Australasian Vertebrate Pest Conference
Protecting Nature: A night with Australia's environmental biosecurity chief
Cairns Bonantza eco-hunt is on
Asian black-spined toad
Australia draws up hit list of overseas environmental pests and diseases
Fairy tern. Photo: JJ Harrison | www.jjharrison.com.au | CC BY-SA 3.0
Sometimes, even just one cat is one too many
Our first biosecurity symposium a smashing success
Feral cat control in Victoria hamstrung by poor regulations

2 Responses to “Hunting Changes in NSW Fail to Address the Problem”

  1. The part i find interesting is that you forgot to mention the person who wrote the governance report steve dunn is under investigation from the indepndant commission against corruption.

    I would take what he said with a grain of salt until the findings become known.

    The governance report will lose all credibility if Mr Dunn is found to be corrupt.

  2. “Out of control hunting culture within Government”? I think you need to be a bit more circumspect in your assertions. Hunting is subject to numerous laws and controls and by world standards Australian Governments are highly suspicious of and antagonistic towards hunting even though the vast majority of hunting activity targets feral animals.

    Hunting is a powerful force in the control of feral animal populations (e.g. 50,000 deer shot by recreational hunters in Victoria last year). Do some research on the extraordinary lengths that North American wildlife management authorities go to to limit the harvest of hunted game species.

    Hunting could be an even more powerful force in the control of feral animals if it wasn’t unnecessarily constrained by non-sensical exclusions from large swathes of land such as National Parks, Wilderness Areas, closed water supply catchments etc which currently act as feral animal sanctuaries. (And yes I agree that shooting deer under spotlight is another unjustified constraint.) Pest management authorities should put their efforts into harnessing that power rather than continually opposing it.

    I think I should point out that there are plenty of feral animal populations in Australia which are not subject to any hunting pressure at all (e.g. rats, mice, Cane Toads, Gambusia, Tilapia, European wasps). If the model of feral animal control espoused by the Invasive Species Council(i.e. all done under Government sponsored programs with recreational hunting playing no part) is so superior, why aren’t they being more successful in eradicating these species?