How do our political parties stack up on invasive species?

The responses to our election survey are in and we can now let you know what the main parties propose to do to address the threat of invasive species to the natural environment. Our questions were based on eight reform priorities we put to the main parties.

Major parties

In short, the Greens support most of the Invasive Species Council’s proposals to improve our biosecurity system, the Coalition have shown interest in strengthening some parts of the broader biosecurity system while Labor proposes small improvements, but nothing of substance to advance environmental biosecurity.

See below how the Greens, Liberals/Nationals and the Labor Party rate against our eight questions. Note that the parties do have other biosecurity policies which may be beneficial for conservation – for example, support for on-ground control programs.

Which party cares about invasive species?

Greens: The Greens support the establishment of an independent, science-based biosecurity authority supported by a commission of experts to make biosecurity decisions based on risks. This would be a major improvement on the current system that lacks independence and transparency. The Greens also support the Invasive Species Council’s call for a Parliamentary inquiry into Australia’s preparedness for new environmental invaders.

Coalition: The Liberal National coalition has consistently worked to critique failures in the broader quarantine system that threatens the agricultural sector. Environment spokesperson, Greg Hunt, supports Invasive Species Council’s proposal for Environment Health Australia, an institution to foster collaborative ecological solutions for invasive species.  The Coalition has announced biosecurity improvements as part of its Agriculture Policy that include $20M in new money for a Biosecurity Flying Squad to quickly respond to new outbreaks and a review of the risk assessment process to lower the risk of new incursions and to make better use of science.

The Coalition has promised to create a ‘green army’, to preserve funding for Caring for our Country and better support Landcare but will close down the $1B Biodiversity Fund that helps tackle on-ground weed and pest problems. There may be additional effort to tackle some weed and feral animal problems but for the Coalition to meet its stated goal to reverse environmental decline in five years it will need to do much more to respond to Australia’s massive invasive species threats.

Labor: 

Labor has squandered a major opportunity to reform the biosecurity system, backing down on the key recommendations of a major 2008 inquiry to establish an independent biosecurity authority and better resource the sector. The Biosecurity Bill, now stalled in the Senate, ignored many environmental and industry concerns and failed to reform decision-making processes to ensure transparency, independence, community involvement and consistently science-based decisions. There were some positive aspects of the Bill such as a national system for ballast water regulation.

Labor’s Caring for our Country program will continue to support on-ground control of many weeds and feral animals. Labor has promised a modest $20m for a new Community Weed Management Fund to ‘eradicate Australia’s most noxious weeds’. These funds presumably replace the recently axed Weeds of National Significance program, but without the coordination.

Other parties:

We have also reviewed the policies of many of the minor parties. Only Katter’s Australia Party and One Nation mention biosecurity. Some minor parties will be much better than others on the environment more generally, which will help with invasive species management. For example, the Animal Justice Party advocates some strong conservation measures.

Where do the other parties stand on invasives?

More details

We’ve posted a more detailed review of the main party policies, our survey and the party responses at our Election pages.

Authorised by Andrew Cox, 88b Station St, Fairfield, Vic, 3078.


[1] Greens response to ISC Election survey: “interested in exploring further the concept of Environmental Health Australia”

[2] Letter from Greg Hunt to Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, May 2012.

[3] Liberal/National Agriculture Policy: improve “import risk analysis and quarantine arrangements [to] better integrate science in quarantine decisions”

[4] Greens Our Biodiversity Crisis Policy: “Develop and resource the implementation of … threat abatement plans”

[5] Liberal/National parties announced five-year environmental targets and a Threatened Species Commissioner to monitor performance but it is unclear whether there will be a target that includes reducing the threat from invasive species.

[6] Greens Our Biodiversity Crisis Policy: “Develop and resource the implementation of … threat abatement plans”


Related posts

Protecting Nature: A night with Australia's environmental biosecurity chief
Cairns Bonantza eco-hunt is on
Asian black-spined toad
Australia draws up hit list of overseas environmental pests and diseases
Fairy tern. Photo: JJ Harrison | www.jjharrison.com.au | CC BY-SA 3.0
Sometimes, even just one cat is one too many
Our first biosecurity symposium a smashing success
Feral cat control in Victoria hamstrung by poor regulations
How would you like to be part of a global conservation project on one of the most unique and beautiful places in the world, Lord Howe Island? Photo of Lord Howe Island used courtesy of the Lord Howe Island Board, Lord Howe Tourism.
Opportunity of a lifetime on Lord Howe Island
Can we turn the global plastics catastrophe into an environmental win?
Rally for Kosci
The view out over Stanwell Park in NSW. Feral deer have been destroying local bushland. Photo: David McKelvey | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Feral deer destroying a lifetime of bushcare conservation

One Response to “How do our political parties stack up on invasive species?”

  1. Reblogged this on Invasives blog.