Today we provided a submission on the 3rd tranche of reforms to implement the new EPBC Act provisions, including the detail sitting behind the new bioregional planning framework. In our submission, we make ask the government to seize the opportunity for:
- bioregional guidance plans to have regard to the Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) and Environmental Offsets standards, and limit the proposed transitional exemption for bioregional guidance plans already in development to the Community Engagement Standard only, so that the Data and Information Standard still applies at the time such plans are made
- bioregional plans to identify and address key threatening processes and relevant threat abatement plans, especially for restoration actions and monitoring
- bioregional plan reviews to assess whether conservation objectives are being achieved by reference to the actual condition of protected matters, not only whether the plan is operating as intended procedurally
- the Restoration Contributions Holder to act consistently with all relevant principles of the Environmental Offsets Standard
- maintenance periods for restoration actions to reflect the ongoing nature of threatening process management, with no durability exit where the action depends on continuing invasive species control, and with charges priced accordingly.