Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Froggatt Awards

Our Work   |  Froggatt Awards  |  Nominations

Nominations

Every year we recognise outstanding achievements in Australia’s fight against environmental weeds, diseases and pest animals through our Froggatt Awards and for the first time are opening up nominations to the public.

Do you know an individual or organisation who deserves public recognition for their work protecting Australia’s native plants and animals from environmental weeds, diseases or pest animals?

If so, please nominate them for a Froggatt Award using the nomination form below or download the nomination form as a Word document.

In the past our Froggatt Awards have gone to some incredible individuals and programs, including a young man who discovered a new infestation of yellow crazy ants in Lismore and volunteers who spent 10 years eradicating the weed sea spurge from Tasmania’s rugged southwest coastline.

Nominations close on 30 October 2022.

Awards will be given for significant achievement in reducing the threat to the Australian environment from invasive species.

Nominations will be assessed for demonstrated leadership, innovation, or exemplary biosecurity practices. Nominations for efforts that advance prevention or early action are particularly encouraged.

Awards will be given for significant achievement in reducing the threat to the Australian environment from invasive species.
Nominations will be assessed for demonstrated leadership, innovation, or exemplary biosecurity practices. Nominations for efforts that advance prevention or early action are particularly encouraged.

Any field of biosecurity (broadly defined), including policy advances, awareness raising, research and on-ground work. Efforts must relate to protecting the Australian environment from invasive species, including effort that has an international element. An invasive species can be an invasive plant, animal, or pathogen on the land or in the water.

• Policy and law.
• Control and eradication.
• Surveillance.
• Principled decision-making.
• Community advocacy.

  • When a Froggatt Award is presented, the information contained within the nomination form may be used by the Invasive Species Council for promotional purposes.
  • The selection panel has absolute discretion in selecting award recipients and decisions are not subject to appeal.
  • Individuals, groups and organisations can nominate themselves.
  • Nominees can be more than one person, group or organisation for joint efforts.
  • Individuals, groups and organisations may not be nominated for an award category they have previously received.
  • A separate nomination is required for each category.
  • Personal information collected will be securely held and used for contact purposes. Individual names may be publicised when the award is announced.
  • Information in nominations will be treated as confidential until the awards are announced, after which the information may be publicly disseminated.
  • Nominators are expected to assist with publicity of the achievements of the nominee.
  • By making a nomination, you grant the Invasive Species Council a non-exclusive, indefinite right to use the information submitted, including any photos, for promotional purposes.

‘Personal information’ means any information or opinion about an identified, or reasonably identifiable, individual.

The collection of personal information by the Invasive Species Council in this form is for the purposes of assessing nominations and presenting awards for the Froggatt Awards and related purposes, including contacting nominees and winners and related publicity. Personal information may be disclosed to the Invasive Species Council staff, contractors, a selection panel and published on the council’s website for these purposes.

Nomination Form

Froggatt Awards Nomination Form

1. Nomination category

I am nominating in the following category (select applicable):


Nomination category(Required)

2. Nominee details

I am nominating (select applicable):


Individual or Group/Organisation

3. What has been achieved to significantly reduce the threat of invasive species to the Australian environment?

Please explain what the individual or group/organisation has achieved to protect Australia's natural environment and/or native species from invasive species. Nominations for efforts that advance prevention or early action are particularly encouraged. Attach supporting information such as photos and evidence that clearly demonstrates the success of this achievement (500 words max).


Accepted file types: pdf, docdocx, Max. file size: 10 MB.

4. Why is this achievement significant?

Outline why this achievement is significant. Nominations will be assessed for demonstrated leadership, innovation, or exemplary biosecurity practices (max 500 words).


5. Nominee declaration


Nominee declaration(Required)

Our 2021 awards went to a variety of individuals, community groups and large eradication project. We also rescinded a past Froggatt Award for the first time!

In 2020 we saw some outstanding efforts from the winners of our annual Froggatt Awards.

In 2019 our Froggatt Awards went to Southern Downs Regional Council, Milo Yeigh and to the Hon David Littleproud.

In 2018 our Froggatt Awards went to community group Save Kosci, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Tarrangower Cactus Control Group.

In 2017 our Froggatt Awards went to the independent panel reviewing the national biosecurity system and Nic Gill, author of Animal Eco-Warriors: Humans and Animals Working Together to Protect Our Planet.

In 2016 our Froggatt Awards went to Gregory Andrews, Australia’s first Threatened Species Commissioner, SPRATS, the Sea Spurge Action Teams and Ecology Australia.

In 2015 our Froggatt Awards went to Australian Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources, Barnaby Joyce, NSW red imported fire ant response and Senate Environment and Communications References Committee.

Dear Project Team,

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]


Dear Project Team,

[YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

Kind regards,
[Your name]
[Your email address]
[Your postcode]