Offsets have generally failed to compensate for environmental damage not otherwise avoided or mitigated. But done well, offsets can present an opportunity to protect habitat or areas under imminent threat – from development or invasive species – or to restore the environment above and beyond the level of an approved impact, including at a landscape scale.
However, in its current form, the draft National Environmental Standard on Environmental Offsets risks perpetuating the flawed offsets system criticised by the Samuel Review – a system that conservationists and ecologists described as a ‘licence for destruction’ and for which there is scant evidence of it having delivered quantifiable, long-term ecological improvements.

This flawed system incentivises developers to see offsets as a starting point rather than an option of last resort and fails to ensure that offsets are resilient to threats, like invasive species and climate change.