MEET THE INVADERS

Gamba Grass

Gamba grass is no ordinary pasture plant – it’s now at the heart of a fierce fight to stop its spread across northern Australia.

It’s a towering, flammable grass that can grow up to 4 metres high and spreads like wildfire. That’s gamba grass.

Its seeds spread with wind or water, and it can hitch a ride on hay, vehicles and machinery.

Gamba grass has a deep root system, dense tussocks (up to 70 cm in diameter), rapid growth and prolific seed production.

In tropical Africa, where it is native, gamba grass is controlled by native grazers such as antelope and buffalo.

In its home range, fire is part of the natural rhythm – and gamba grass fits into that system without overwhelming it. But in Australia, it means hotter, more frequent fires.

Gamba Grass fires produce flame heights that are higher than typical fires causing canopy fires that affect the whole tree crown!

Invasion story

Gamba Grass was first introduced to Australia in 1931 as a potential pasture grass.

Adaptable and hardy, gamba grass thrives in the toughest conditions like drought, fire and poor-quality soil common in northern Australian savannas.

Early trials at the Katherine Research Station in 1946 in the Northern Territory experimented with plantings, later expanding to the Berrimah Experiment Farm. 

This was a time when state governments and the CSIRO (then the CSIR) were importing thousands of grass and legume species to trial for livestock grazing, many of which have also become invasive.

Large-scale plantings began in the 1980s when commercial quantities of seed became available. Praised for its ability to rapidly improve pasture productivity, it was then widely sown across northern Australia, even spread via aircraft!

But like many good ideas, it didn’t quite work out as expected.

Although the grass was productive for cattle, the advice to manage it by grazing wasn’t practical. The seeds of gamba grass were easily spread by the wind and before long, it was escaping from paddocks and into the wild. What began as a solution for farmers turned into a giant problem for others. 

The grass rapidly spread, including into protected areas like Kakadu National Park.

The Northern Territory Government initiated control programs in the early 2000s, but despite these efforts, gamba grass continued to spread across northern Australia.

In 2009, gamba grass was first detected in the Northern Territory’s Litchfield National Park, home to species found nowhere else on Earth, like the Litchfield Hibiscus. ​As of early 2023, gamba grass had infested approximately 20% of the park, with projections that this infestation could take over 30% of the park by 2032, threatening ecosystem collapse.

Today, it is estimated that gamba grass has spread to over 1.5 million hectares of the Northern Territory, including around Darwin, Batchelor and Katherine.

It has also established in the east Kimberley region of Western Australia and across coastal and sub-coastal areas of North Queensland.

How did we get here?

In the late 90s, concern about hotter, more frequent bushfires was brewing. It didn’t take long for ecologists to sound the alarm. Research in the early 2000s demonstrated that gamba grass tripled fire intensities, reduced available soil nitrate levels by 70% and tripled grass water use. 

But because some graziers valued gamba grass, politicians were initially reluctant to ban it. 

Those pushing for action were up against a powerful force. Pastoralists who had planted it stood by it, pointing to its value as fast-growing cattle fodder. And with the grazing lobby holding significant political sway, early calls for bans went nowhere. 

But as it became more widespread, the consequences for both people and nature of gamba-fuelled fires became harder to ignore.

The Invasive Species Council led the charge to have it declared a weed in Queensland and supported the campaign in the Northern Territory. 200 ecologists and weed scientists endorsed a gamba declaration, initiated by the Council, calling for a ban on planting and sale. Yielding to public concern, all 3 governments across the north banned gamba grass in 2008.  

In 2009 gamba grass was listed as a national key threatening process and in 2012 as a weed of national significance. 

In 2010, the Northern Territory government released its first gamba grass plan, which specified a zone requiring eradication and a zone requiring control.

In 2020 a second plan was released and a gamba army was established to manage gamba in protected areas and community sites. Federal funding of $9.8 million over 4 years in 2022 has boosted capacity. But despite the best efforts of many Territorians, gamba grass continues to spread.  

A review of the threat abatement plan for gamba grass concluded that ‘efforts are hindered by lack of funding and resources.’

Western Australia has been fortunate that gamba grass plantings were limited, and the state is now on the cusp of eradicating it in the Kimberley.

But elsewhere, coordinated action has been slow to come. 

In Queensland, despite the ban, progress has been patchy. With no coordinated state-wide management strategy or reporting, efforts are left largely to local governments and outcomes vary.

In 2022, after years of advocacy, $24.8 million was committed to support both the Cairns and Townsville yellow crazy ant eradication programs, which are now renowned for being one of the most successful ant eradication programs in the world. In 2024, the Queensland LNP committed funding to extend the program for 2 more years from 2026.

The toll on nature

Gamba grass is fast becoming a major headache for anyone working to manage the environment in the Top End. But it’s not just its sheer size or how quickly it grows that’s causing problems – it’s the way it fuels and spreads fire.

This grass is a serious threat to wildlife, homes, agriculture and even tourism. 

It’s not just highly flammable; it’s seriously resilient. Gamba grass can support fires more than once a year because it bounces back quickly after burning, making it even more dangerous. 

It can completely change fire patterns. Fire managers in the Northern Territory have found that gamba grass fires are far harder to control and much more dangerous than those fueled by native grasses.

These fires burn up to 8 times hotter than native grass fires and spread twice as fast, making it almost impossible for native animals to escape or find shelter. 

In fact, a gamba grass fire once reached a record-breaking 43,000 kW/m, the highest intensity fire ever recorded in the Northern Territory. That’s not just high – it’s catastrophic.

These intense fires kill trees, turning savanna woodlands into gamba grasslands. They injure and kill wildlife like northern quolls and destroy their shelters, increasing their exposure to predators. 

But the destruction doesn’t end with fire. Gamba grass also degrades and transforms the environment by depleting soil nutrients and lowering water availability in wetlands and streams often critical for the survival of native wildlife. 

For all of these reasons, it is listed as a Weed of National Significance (WONS).

Cultural consequences

The impact this is having on Indigenous culture in places like the Northern Territory, Kimberly and remote arid Indigenous communities is profound. 

When gamba grass pushes out native species this includes bush tucker and bush medicines, as well as access to sacred sites – all important to Indigenous culture and way of life. 

It’s also undermining the hard work of Indigenous rangers and threatening Indigenous protected areas across northern Australia. It threatens the viability of many existing and potential carbon projects on Indigenous lands.

gouldian_finch2
The spread of gamba grass is altering the habitat of the endangered Gouldian finch in northern Australia, particularly by increasing the frequency and intensity of fires. Photo: Geoff Whalan.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
The spread of gamba grass in northern Australia poses a significant threat to the vulnerable Darwin cycad (Cycas armstrongii) by increasing fuel loads and the intensity of fires, leading to high mortality rates in adult cycads and hindering regeneration. Photo: John Tann.
Northern Quoll HWY-690 ©Wade Hughes-Lochman LT
The Northern quoll is one of the biggest casualties of the gamba grass invasion. This small carnivorous marsupial is already struggling due to cane toads, but gamba grass is another major threat. Gamba-fuelled fires destroy the hollow logs and rock crevices quolls use for shelter, leaving them exposed to predators like feral cats. They also wipe out key food sources. Photo: Hughes Lochman.

How do we fix this?

Gamba grass shows the critical need to assess the invasive risks of plants before allowing them to be planted.  It is the most serious of dozens of pasture plants in northern Australia that have become invasive.

Unfortunately, some graziers continue to defend the use of gamba grass, seeing it as a useful pasture grass despite the mounting evidence of its harm. 

The Invasive Species Council has been long advocating for stronger measures to control gamba grass. More funding is needed to fully implement the weed and threat abatement plans – to contain, eradicate (where feasible) and control it, to avert ecosystem collapse in Litchfield National Park and to investigate biological control options. 

This will require a collaborative effort between governments, local communities, Indigenous groups and environmental organisations.

Gamba grass is one escaped plant of many!

As concerned citizens, we all have a role to play:

Educate yourself and others: Share this profile with others so more people understand why it’s such a dangerous plant.

Get involved locally: If you’re from the NT or Qld join local efforts to control gamba grass, whether that’s through volunteering or participating in local education programs. Many regional groups across northern Australia work on weed control. You can search for your local group via Landcare Australia or Bushcare Australia.

FAQs

Gamba grass increases fire intensity and displaces native vegetation, leading to habitat degradation and the decline of native wildlife.

Gamba grass was brought to Australia as one of thousands of potential pasture plants – as part of a push to replace vast swathes of native grasslands with more productive food for cattle. This was before any concern about environmental weeds. A requirement for weed risk assessment for imported plants came only in 1997.

Control methods include fire management, chemical herbicides and mechanical removal. Long-term solutions focus on restoring native plant species and managing fire regimes.

Gamba grass is invasive in northern Australia, particularly in Queensland and the Northern Territory.

Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. (n.d.). Andropogon gayanus (gamba grass). Retrieved from https://profiles.ala.org.au/opus/weeds-australia/profile/Andropogon%20gayanus

Northern Territory Government. (2022). Protecting people and the environment: Containing and eradicating dangerous gamba grass infestations in the Northern Territory.

Setterfield, S. A., Rossiter-Rachor, N. A., & Adams, V. M. (2018). Navigating the fiery debate: The role of scientific evidence in eliciting policy and management responses for contentious plants in northern Australia. Retireved from https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18028

Williams, G. & McLellan, L. (2022). The ecological consequences of invasive grasses on fire regimes in Australia. Journal of Environmental Management. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116785

Invasive Species Council. (2008). Queensland bans gamba grass: Feral Herald, Volume 1, Issue 18.

Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. (2023). Northern Australia Introduced Grasses. Retrieved from https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/env/pages/99dfad7e-9feb-4da1-826b-fdf5740ffa5e/files/northern-australia-introduced-grasses.pdf

Country Needs People. (2023). Gamba grass: A massive threat to biodiversity, safety and culture. Retrieved from https://www.countryneedspeople.org.au/gamba_grass_massive_threat_to_biodiversity_safety_and_culture

Rossiter, N. A., et al. (2003). Gamba grass and fire intensity in northern Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 24(3), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00020.x

Setterfield, S. A., et al. (2010). Impact of gamba grass on fire regimes and biodiversity in northern Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, 24(3), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00688.x

Chaseling, O. (2023, February 26). Report recommends urgent expansion of gamba grass eradication zone as Litchfield National Park faces growing threat. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-

Department of Environment, Parks and Water Security. (2021, November). Cycas armstrongii. Northern Territory Government. https://nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/208430/cycas-armstrongii.pdf

Northern Territory Department of Environment, Parks and Water Security. (2021). Cycas armstrongii.

Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) 2021, Threat abatement plan to reduce the impacts on northern Australia’s biodiversity by the five listed grasses: Review 2012–2021, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 15 April 2025, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/tap-reduce-impacts-northern-australias-biodiversity-five-listed-grasses-review-2012-2021.pdf.​

Lonsdale, WM 2004, ‘Predicting the spread of invasive species: the influence of environmental resistance, propagule pressure and the Allee effect’, in B Sindel & S Johnson (eds), Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 6–9 September 2004, Weed Society of New South Wales, Sydney, pp. 168–171, viewed 15 April 2025, https://caws.org.nz/old-site/awc/2004/awc200411681.pdf.​

Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) 2021, Threat abatement plan to reduce the impacts on northern Australia’s biodiversity by the five listed grasses: Review 2012–2021, Australian Government, Canberra, viewed 15 April 2025, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/tap-reduce-impacts-northern-australias-biodiversity-five-listed-grasses-review-2012-2021.pdf.​

Related content

Myrtle rust on scrub myrtle (Rhodamnia rubsecens) has been so badly hit by myrtle rust since the disease reached  Australia in 2010 that is was nominated for listing as critically endangered.

Learn about more of Australia’s worst invasive species

Learn about foxes

Your gift is a lifeline for nature.

Our protected areas are being trashed, trampled, choked and polluted by an onslaught of invaders. Invasive species are already the overwhelming driver of our animal extinction rate, and are expected to cause 75 of the next 100 extinctions.

But you can help to turn this around and create a wildlife revival in Australia. 

From numbats to night parrots, a tax-deductible donation today can help defend our wildlife against the threat of invasive weeds, predators, and diseases.

As the only national advocacy environment group dedicated to stopping this mega threat, your gift will make a big difference.

Do you need help?

Accordion Content

A silent crisis is unfolding across Australia. Every year, billions of native animals are hunted and killed by cats and foxes. Fire ants continue to spread and threaten human health. And the deadly strain of bird flu looms on the horizon. Your donation today will be used to put the invasive species threat in the media, make invasive species a government priority, ensure governments take rapid action to protect nature and our remarkable native wildlife from invasives-led extinction, death and destruction.

Donate Now

If you are having trouble submitting a form, please read this guide.

Please fill out the following form and one of our team will be in contact to assist as soon as possible. Please make sure to include any helpful information, such as the device you were using (computer, tablet or mobile phone) and if known, your browser (Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, Safari etc)

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, docx, doc, pdf, txt, Max. file size: 10 MB, Max. files: 4.

    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]


    Dear Project Team,

    [YOUR PERSONALISED MESSAGE WILL APPEAR HERE.] 

    I support the amendment to the Kosciuszko National Park Wild Horse Heritage Management Plan to allow our incredible National Parks staff to use aerial shooting as one method to rapidly reduce feral horse numbers. I want to see feral horse numbers urgently reduced in order to save the national park and our native wildlife that live there.

    The current approach is not solving the problem. Feral horse numbers have rapidly increased in Kosciuszko National Park to around 18,000, a 30% jump in just the past 2 years. With the population so high, thousands of feral horses need to be removed annually to reduce numbers and stop our National Park becoming a horse paddock. Aerial shooting, undertaken humanely and safely by professionals using standard protocols, is the only way this can happen.

    The government’s own management plan for feral horses states that ‘if undertaken in accordance with best practice, aerial shooting can have the lowest negative animal welfare impacts of all lethal control methods’.

    This humane and effective practice is already used across Australia to manage hundreds of thousands of feral animals like horses, deer, pigs, and goats.

    Trapping and rehoming of feral horses has been used in Kosciuszko National Park for well over a decade but has consistently failed to reduce the population, has delayed meaningful action and is expensive. There are too many feral horses in the Alps and not enough demand for rehoming for it to be relied upon for the reduction of the population.

    Fertility control as a management tool is only effective for a small, geographically isolated, and accessible population of feral horses where the management outcome sought is to maintain the population at its current size. It is not a viable option to reduce the large and growing feral horse population in the vast and rugged terrain of Kosciuszko National Park.

    Feral horses are trashing and trampling our sensitive alpine ecosystems and streams, causing the decline and extinction of native animals. The federal government’s Threatened Species Scientific Committee has stated that feral horses ‘may be the crucial factor that causes final extinction’ for 12 alpine species.

    I recognise the sad reality that urgent and humane measures are necessary to urgently remove the horses or they will destroy the Snowies and the native wildlife that call the mountains home. I support a healthy national park where native species like the Corroboree Frog and Mountain Pygmy Possum can thrive.

    Kind regards,
    [Your name]
    [Your email address]
    [Your postcode]