The Invasive Species Council is calling for a full investigation of allegations of serious enforcement failings inside Australia’s federal biosecurity agency, reported in a new review by the Inspector-General of Biosecurity.
The review – assessing the regulatory maturity of the agency – draws on confidential staff surveys and uncovers major concerns about weak, inconsistent and politicised enforcement.
Staff surveyed for the review highlight:
- concerns about a lack of consequence for repeat offenders and inconsistent enforcement due to perceived political pressure
- a lack of visibility on noncompliance reporting once a report is submitted
- gaps in addressing persistent issues such as illegal imports or loopholes in cargo and mail pathways
- a lack of follow-up on reported noncompliance
- leniency in addressing noncompliance from high-profile businesses
Dr Carol Booth, Policy Director at the Invasive Species Council, said:
‘We are utterly shocked by the report’s findings. When biosecurity staff themselves are reporting an alleged lack of consequence for repeat offenders and inconsistent enforcement reportedly due to political pressure, that should set off alarm bells at the highest levels of government.
‘Staff have also raised gaps around illegal imports and loopholes in cargo and mail pathways, a lack of follow-up on non-compliance, and alleged leniency towards high-profile businesses. These are deeply troubling revelations.
‘Based on what biosecurity officers are telling the Inspector-General, the agency appears to have major enforcement problems. We need a full and urgent investigation into these allegations.
‘Important questions must be answered – Why are repeat offenders allegedly not being prosecuted? Why are high-profile businesses getting favoured treatment? Why is non-compliance being ignored? Why are loopholes left unaddressed?
‘These failures put Australia at enormous risk. Rigorous enforcement is the backbone of biosecurity – especially when there are strong commercial incentives for businesses to cut corners or break the law.
‘We are also alarmed by staff concerns about political and industry influence on biosecurity decision-making. Biosecurity decisions must be made impartially – based solely on the risk to Australia’s environment, economy and way of life – not on who is applying pressure behind the scenes.
‘Any political or industry influence over biosecurity decisions is dangerous when we are already battling invasive species that cause more extinctions in Australia than any other threat. If enforcement is weakened or priorities are distorted, it opens the door to new invaders and diseases.
‘Biosecurity officers have a responsibility to protect Australia, and they should never be put in a position where political considerations override the science. The government must urgently investigate these claims.
‘Biosecurity only works when the rules are enforced, every time, with no fear or favour.’
Media inquiries: (02) 8006 5004